Reservations, OBCs, women, and my right
At the outset, let me state this - by birth (and to a great extent by upbringing) I am a Brahmin. I was born with the privilege of being born into a family with considerable socio-intellectual capital. So it would be easy to read anything that I write on the OBC reservations issue, as something that comes without the insight of belonging to a certain community.
However, let's say we put aside this issue of reservations for OBCs and the already existing quota for SC / STs. Suppose I pick up the issue reservations in higher education for women. As a woman and a practicing feminist - who is very passionate about getting women into the best of institutes and opening up more opportunities for them - I should support reservations for them right?
Wrong. Some reasons why.
1. The Usual Suspect: Given stereotyping and traditional barriers, if I am a woman in a particular setting, it is often suspected that I got there through favours. This favour by the government is no less. Regardless of what merit I may possess, the suspect factor remains that I got there through other means. Even if it is a legitimate way to enter - it is sends signals about my merit. Whatever social capital I may appear to gain, it is overshadowed by the constant doubt over my merit. It also makes ALL women appear suspect. Irrespective of how they got there. Merit or Reservation (partial merit?).
2. The Usual Beneficiary: Higher Education in India is not the preserve of those with money. Money is usually not a barrier. Suppose I was 16 and studying for the JEE. What I really need is good quality coaching. God knows that the CBSE and State Board seem inadequate. I would really appreciate if interest groups pushed for bridge classes to overcome the entry barrier, instead of institutionalizing mechanism that help override the entry point. I would already have to some of the economic capital if I have been able to study till the 12th grade. If loans are available at extremely low interest rates, and payable over long periods of time - I have a feeling a woman would benefit far more than her being plonked into an institute where she's unable to cope with the subject matter. Moreover, it's likely that a woman like me who comes from a privileged background who will end up using this quota.
3. The Gap: If Education at the same institute is such an equalizer, why have reservations at the Under Graduate level? If all these kids have cleared their Class 12 examinations and are at the same educational level - why the need to lower the cut-off for one section? Even more shocking - why would the women need reservations at the Post Graduate level? Wouldn't three to four years of the same education, additional bridge courses etc. have pushed the men and women to a level playing field based on merit?
4. Universalizing Primary Education: Education. Primary Education. The government makes feeble attempts at universalizing primary education and FAILS. It's been failing consistently since 1947. It's the worst report card a country can produce - that most of the country still can't read it. The issue with primary education is that it is so centralized, that it's difficult to hold an absentee or inefficient teacher responsible. The teacher in a school is simply not answerable to the community.
Suppose a teacher discriminates against girls in a government school - the parents have no choice! Now the government either needs to clear up its act and decentralize schooling and education, or it needs to give more impetus to private schools. Every state perhaps cannot do a Himachal Pradesh, or a Kerala and maybe condemned to a cycle of inefficiency that means poor education, high drop out rates with far more heavy consequences for historically weaker sections like women. (hint!)
If you tell me that private schools are expensive - think again. The market forces are not allowed to operate. If enough parents feel that the teacher discriminates against girls in a private school - chances are that another private player will recognize the gap - and start a school that is more gender sensitive. I understand that this school, in an ideal situation need not be gender-blind. The school will need to reach out to parents to convince them to continue in the school. (Which school wouldn't want fees the next year?) The school has further reasons to push parents to send their girls to college. Because earning women make a better case for the school to urge all parents to send their girls to school. If the fees do not appear to go down despite schools competing for children, well, in that case - let their be an open system where you apply to the government for scholarships. The government employees god-knows-how-many community workers, block resource centre workers etc in any case. Put them to some use! Either case, the government technically is supposed to monitor the progress of each child under the ICDS (Integrated Child Development Scheme) - let health workers report on a regular basis about who they can afford education.
A girl will never be able to well in an IIT or in DU, unless her fundamental knowledge is clear. That knowledge is built over the many years through primary and secondary education. The government must then identify situation where market forces do not see adequate incentives and provide the incentives. The private schooling sector at the primary level can be and is regulated. The schools can still be answerable to government institutions that set standards for examination and progress-reporting.
5. Services: The government charges for a million services for women. Make sure the women actually access these services. If women charge these services (which they indirectly pay for) they resolve many of the issues that solutions like reservation attempt to address.
6. Time Bound: At what point will we establish that women and men are capable of generating similar socio-economic capital? Or that, irrespective of that capital - they will be able to leverage opportunities? When do we make the transition from "positive discrimination" to "positive action"? How do you arrive at that figure? How will you ever calculate? How will you measure when the impact of patriarchy has weakened enough for women to not need the quota?
7. Stop Gap: Working on systemic inefficiencies is far more difficult. But any other solution is a stop gap arrangement. It will never resolve the problems of the next generation. The government is distracting you from far greater issues affecting women. Property rights, political, civil, economic and rights over the person to start with. Oh, and how about opening more colleges to begin with. Why do so many people have to compete for such a small number of seats even at the undergraduate level?
8. Rights: Yes. It's against the rights of a man to be discriminated against because of the fact that he is a man. It's precisely the way women have been discriminated against always. I have no wish to perpetuate the system that is built on letting the divide be intact. A system need not be gender blind to be gender sensitive. The needs are different but need not be satisfied at the cost of the rights of the other. While patriarchy has traditionally favoured men, reservation is essentially a patriarchal solution. Oppressing is not the way out of oppression. Rights are to protect the vulnerable not to pander to them.
9. It's insulting: Don't favour me because I am a woman. Favour me because I am smarter, more intelligent and more capable. If I am as smart as the man. Treat me as an equal. Give me the same opportunity. Give me a loan to set up my business, don't bloody walk into my shop and tell me that you are going to run it for me because I can't do it for myself.
This post is essentially a spontaneous one. I wanted to write about my opposition to the notion of extending the reservation quota. But my own context would make it seem that I am doing so to protect my interest. (Yes, I am. I am always very concerned about the snatching away of my rights.) But the context of a feminist building a case against reservations for women in educational institutions helps in articulating my concerns when it comes to reservations as a whole.
Evenstar is collating posts on the issue here.
However, let's say we put aside this issue of reservations for OBCs and the already existing quota for SC / STs. Suppose I pick up the issue reservations in higher education for women. As a woman and a practicing feminist - who is very passionate about getting women into the best of institutes and opening up more opportunities for them - I should support reservations for them right?
Wrong. Some reasons why.
1. The Usual Suspect: Given stereotyping and traditional barriers, if I am a woman in a particular setting, it is often suspected that I got there through favours. This favour by the government is no less. Regardless of what merit I may possess, the suspect factor remains that I got there through other means. Even if it is a legitimate way to enter - it is sends signals about my merit. Whatever social capital I may appear to gain, it is overshadowed by the constant doubt over my merit. It also makes ALL women appear suspect. Irrespective of how they got there. Merit or Reservation (partial merit?).
2. The Usual Beneficiary: Higher Education in India is not the preserve of those with money. Money is usually not a barrier. Suppose I was 16 and studying for the JEE. What I really need is good quality coaching. God knows that the CBSE and State Board seem inadequate. I would really appreciate if interest groups pushed for bridge classes to overcome the entry barrier, instead of institutionalizing mechanism that help override the entry point. I would already have to some of the economic capital if I have been able to study till the 12th grade. If loans are available at extremely low interest rates, and payable over long periods of time - I have a feeling a woman would benefit far more than her being plonked into an institute where she's unable to cope with the subject matter. Moreover, it's likely that a woman like me who comes from a privileged background who will end up using this quota.
3. The Gap: If Education at the same institute is such an equalizer, why have reservations at the Under Graduate level? If all these kids have cleared their Class 12 examinations and are at the same educational level - why the need to lower the cut-off for one section? Even more shocking - why would the women need reservations at the Post Graduate level? Wouldn't three to four years of the same education, additional bridge courses etc. have pushed the men and women to a level playing field based on merit?
4. Universalizing Primary Education: Education. Primary Education. The government makes feeble attempts at universalizing primary education and FAILS. It's been failing consistently since 1947. It's the worst report card a country can produce - that most of the country still can't read it. The issue with primary education is that it is so centralized, that it's difficult to hold an absentee or inefficient teacher responsible. The teacher in a school is simply not answerable to the community.
Suppose a teacher discriminates against girls in a government school - the parents have no choice! Now the government either needs to clear up its act and decentralize schooling and education, or it needs to give more impetus to private schools. Every state perhaps cannot do a Himachal Pradesh, or a Kerala and maybe condemned to a cycle of inefficiency that means poor education, high drop out rates with far more heavy consequences for historically weaker sections like women. (hint!)
If you tell me that private schools are expensive - think again. The market forces are not allowed to operate. If enough parents feel that the teacher discriminates against girls in a private school - chances are that another private player will recognize the gap - and start a school that is more gender sensitive. I understand that this school, in an ideal situation need not be gender-blind. The school will need to reach out to parents to convince them to continue in the school. (Which school wouldn't want fees the next year?) The school has further reasons to push parents to send their girls to college. Because earning women make a better case for the school to urge all parents to send their girls to school. If the fees do not appear to go down despite schools competing for children, well, in that case - let their be an open system where you apply to the government for scholarships. The government employees god-knows-how-many community workers, block resource centre workers etc in any case. Put them to some use! Either case, the government technically is supposed to monitor the progress of each child under the ICDS (Integrated Child Development Scheme) - let health workers report on a regular basis about who they can afford education.
A girl will never be able to well in an IIT or in DU, unless her fundamental knowledge is clear. That knowledge is built over the many years through primary and secondary education. The government must then identify situation where market forces do not see adequate incentives and provide the incentives. The private schooling sector at the primary level can be and is regulated. The schools can still be answerable to government institutions that set standards for examination and progress-reporting.
5. Services: The government charges for a million services for women. Make sure the women actually access these services. If women charge these services (which they indirectly pay for) they resolve many of the issues that solutions like reservation attempt to address.
6. Time Bound: At what point will we establish that women and men are capable of generating similar socio-economic capital? Or that, irrespective of that capital - they will be able to leverage opportunities? When do we make the transition from "positive discrimination" to "positive action"? How do you arrive at that figure? How will you ever calculate? How will you measure when the impact of patriarchy has weakened enough for women to not need the quota?
7. Stop Gap: Working on systemic inefficiencies is far more difficult. But any other solution is a stop gap arrangement. It will never resolve the problems of the next generation. The government is distracting you from far greater issues affecting women. Property rights, political, civil, economic and rights over the person to start with. Oh, and how about opening more colleges to begin with. Why do so many people have to compete for such a small number of seats even at the undergraduate level?
8. Rights: Yes. It's against the rights of a man to be discriminated against because of the fact that he is a man. It's precisely the way women have been discriminated against always. I have no wish to perpetuate the system that is built on letting the divide be intact. A system need not be gender blind to be gender sensitive. The needs are different but need not be satisfied at the cost of the rights of the other. While patriarchy has traditionally favoured men, reservation is essentially a patriarchal solution. Oppressing is not the way out of oppression. Rights are to protect the vulnerable not to pander to them.
9. It's insulting: Don't favour me because I am a woman. Favour me because I am smarter, more intelligent and more capable. If I am as smart as the man. Treat me as an equal. Give me the same opportunity. Give me a loan to set up my business, don't bloody walk into my shop and tell me that you are going to run it for me because I can't do it for myself.
This post is essentially a spontaneous one. I wanted to write about my opposition to the notion of extending the reservation quota. But my own context would make it seem that I am doing so to protect my interest. (Yes, I am. I am always very concerned about the snatching away of my rights.) But the context of a feminist building a case against reservations for women in educational institutions helps in articulating my concerns when it comes to reservations as a whole.
Evenstar is collating posts on the issue here.



14 Comments:
The advantage of being a woman. Me being a brahmin man, have the least political chance of making a point like this and getting away with it. Seriously, and I am not happy about it. We are so terribly bothered about political correctness and political sensitivity, that the truth is sometime buried, just because the wrong guy came up with it.
"Don't favour me because I am a woman" - Nicely said Neha.
Very well written. I've tried to put across some of what I feel on my blog, but I doubt I've been able to do as much justice.
Stepping back from the current issue and talking from a disconnect from that which is a hot issue right now will definitely make it easier for a lot of people to relate to.
AB
well written neha...
Hey Neha
I too feel that reservations ahould be only at the entry levels...not through out for anyone to keep re-using it over and over again.
Also the financial status /backgound of a candidate should be the criterion of reservation if any, and that too with a proper verification mechanism in place.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
I suggest a change in the title of thispost - 'the one where Neha proves she is aym-gramd' or some shit like that.
disclaimer - as usual, i did not read the post. its just a blind guess :P
thats my point. Why favouring because one is a girl ? So do u really think that will give an "equal rights" to both the sexes.
I have seen who all go for these kind of SC/ST/OBC reservations, its not the people with challenging economical conditions.
Do you really believe, you can rely on the Doctor you are consulting if he/she got admitted to any Med school because he/she belongs to SC/ST/OBC caste [and "hail the reservations" ]?
I being a brahmin too, feel like we are now belonging to the OIC that is Other Ignored Classes.
Anyway this section is neatly written Neha. Thanks for sharing.
Hi all,
I agree that reservation is not necessarily the best way to ensure 'affirmative action'. It should be used as the last resort and not a political gimmick.
But, there is diff between reservation for women and that for SC/ST/BC. Today, the fraction of girls getting into engineering colleges in TN(IITs are exceptions) is very large(my guess: ~40%). This is without any reservations. But, if reservation in eng colleges were removed, the fraction of SC/ST/BC would drop drastically to pretty pathetic numbers. Both,caste and gender discrimination are rampant. But,we probably need different strategies to tackle them.
All of us want to work towards better primary education etc. But, that is going to take time..right? I feel that some reservation is absolutely necessary to give a 'jerk-start' to the process of getting closer towards equality. The situation probably requires last-resort action.
And neha,
To clarify before there is a misunderstanding, I am not implying that you have made a connection between reservations for women and SC/STs. But, it is quite clear that some of the commenters have assumed such an analogy. My remarks are directed to them.
two generations ago, my family kept slaves and bonded labourers. now, that was in one of those two states you mention as examples of better educational policies. both have ensured near-universal access to education and have achieved 'universal literacy' through grassroots campaigns. both have managed to narrow the gap at the professional level for both women and the so-called BCs. in fact, women have overtaken men on many academic counts in the professions, as in parts of Europe. so far so good.
however, when it comes to the BCs, the situation is different. sure, the creamy layer of BCs have done well. some of the grandchildren of my grandad's slaves have managed to get middle-of-the road jobs and have pulled themselves onto the lower rungs of the middle-class ladder. some have even become professionals. but familial peers of my generation have gone on to Ivy League Unis across the world, largely on merit. and the family had a policy of sending their offspring exclusively to government schools, where our peers included the same guys, plus people from a variety of underprivileged backgrounds, invariably BC. Well, what happened along the way?
I suspect when one is competing with Ben Johnson on steroids (read money, privilege and a culture of intellectual achievement), however world-class your physiology, you would need some steroids yourself if you want to compete on equal terms.
Blanket affirmative action has its drawbacks, and much of what you suggest is sensible, but is it practicable here and now? A variety of projects piggyback on the hapless anganwadi worker, so that's not an easy proposition.
When there is gross poverty of infrastructure/logistics, crude measures are often the only ones that have some chance of implementation. As you rightly said, systemic deficiencies take much longer to fix. But what about the interim?
As for BC doctors, I can assure you they are as good and often much better than the rest. Besides, comments like that stink of eugenics and have no place in rational debate.
I have a hundred things to say, but do google what sushrut jhadav and bhargavi davar for narratives of the individual experience of caste among the so-called creamy layer of BC achievers.
BC is not used in a pejorative sense, in this comment.
Wow! I can't agree with 'nevermind' more :) Even my family had slaves / bonded-laborers (i guess) two generations ago, and I'm happy some justice would hopefully be done to them after all these years and they don't hv to keep pace with Ben Johnsons on steroids, to justify their existance.
Nicely said. Reservations in higher education (esp. in IITs and IIMs) represent tokenism of the worst kind. The reservations in IIMs will benefit a grand total of 300 OBCs (at best) each year - and will lead to a situation wherein no OBC IIM grad can capitalize on the brand equity gained by being an IIM alumnus. And people who can't make it on merit through the IIT JEE are very unlikely to be able to cope with the curiculum. But this is a lot easier than working to fix our school system. For my views on this, you can have a look at this post on my blog
As for Dhoomk2's 'dhoom' post, see my response here, here or here. />
http://www.emotionalzombie.blogspot.com/
My Reservations blog.-It's a bit controversial :)
Post a Comment
This post is linked here:
Create a Link
<< Home